This blog translation is no longer being updated. (More details here.) Sorry for any inconvenience~~!

*****

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

☆週刊プレイボーイ☆ / ☆Shuukan Playboy☆

Theme:blog


For my first job today, I'm doing a photoshoot for Shuukan Playboyハート
[note: 'Shuukan Pureibooi' (週刊プレイボーイ) aka "Weekly Playboy" is a men's magazine, but is not a regional edition of the American magazine Playboy (it seems to be more on the order of normally dressed and scantily clad women, with only a small amount of actually naked ones)]







辻希美オフィシャルブログ「のんピース」powered by Ameba-2009051914120000.jpg








You're just going to have to wait until the issue comes out to see what kind of outfit I was wearing~~ハート







And after we finished shooting,ビックリマーク







I changed back into my regular clothes and did an interview for the magazine~~パー









辻希美オフィシャルブログ「のんピース」powered by Ameba-2009051914250000.jpg








The shoot for Shuukan Playboy is overにひひラブラブラブラブパー








Now I'm heading out to do a job with another magazine~~~にひひラブラブラブラブパー








Off I gooooooo~~ニコニコラブラブラブラブパー




7 comments:

kawaiiriridoll said...

O___O i think i need this magazine.
but.. i doubt UFA would let nono be scantily clad/naked >>

boinsie said...

Other H!P members (including C-ute and Berryz Kobo) are often in Weekly Playboy, and it's never anything even remotely erotic. Just a photoshoot, generally outdoors.
They are generally very nice photos, though~ <3

kawaiiriridoll said...

ooh ok. the description of the magazine threw me off a little ^^;;

chibimizutenshi said...

Not to say that many men don't enjoy the photo's over uberly cute idols ^^;


I'm glad she's most likely dressed normally...cause I think my head would 'splode if Non was scantly clad/naked! @_@

jantzeeee said...

Sorry if the "scantily clad" descriptor threw some of you guys... I'm sure that Non won't be nude or anything in this shoot, and probably won't be wearing anything very revealing, even...but to be fair, it doesn't seem that UFA has a problem with its girls taking photos of the scantily clad variety -- because, seriously, how many bikini shots are there in their various photobooks? ^^;
(In Non no 19, for example...)

kawaiiriridoll said...

ehh, but i think there is a difference in bikinis and lingerie/other things that are meant to be sexy. atleast in my opinion ^^;;

jantzeeee said...

Oh, I agree that there is (or at least, can be) a difference between swimsuits and some other things, but still, not a lot of clothing is being worn, y'know?

And while it's true that a lot of them aren't, it definitely seems that some of those bikini shots (and some others, too) are absolutely meant to be sexy/suggestive...

But I mean, I feel like Non is just messing around here, with her "What I wore is a secret, hee hee~"... I'll be amused when the issue comes out, and she's just wearing, like, the exact same outfit as in the interview or something XD

Post a Comment